|
Improving the Economic Status of Teachers:
A Case of Thailand
Introduction
The very rapid changes occurring in all spheres of life - political, economic,
social, science and technology, especially in information and communication
technologies, have a significant impact on education and its development
process. Such changes have influence on the decision making of various
educational policy issues including the process of learning which directly
affects the status of teachers.
In the International Conference on Partnerships in Teacher Development
for a New Asia organized by UNESCO and UNICEF in association with the Office
of the National Education Commission (ONEC) and Ministry of Education (MOE)
of Thailand during 6-8 December 1995, it was pointed out that the status
of teachers in the Asia-Pacific region has deteriorated. It was concluded
that the related causes are the quality of entrants to teaching profession,
conditions of work, career path, salary structure and lack of both monetary
and non-monetary incentives. The working conditions of teachers have
worsened, resulting from heavy and increasing work load, worsening student-teacher
ratio and unfavorable salary structure. It was, therefore, recommended
that the status of teaching profession can only be improved if teachers
strive to maintain high standard performance, and if teacher education
programs can produce analytical, innovative and creative teachers.
In the meantime, monetary and non-monetary incentives should be increased.
It should be noted that the economic status of the teachers have an impact
on their teaching performance. If the teachers face financial problems,
they will lose morale to improve their teaching, which can adversely affect
the overall educational quality. To be able to accurately analyze
the economic status of teachers, their status in other aspects relating
to the economic status which can affect their teaching quality will also
have to be taken into account.
Limitations
1. Information on the economic status of teachers e.g. their income, expenditures
and debts are limited. Very few studies have been conducted on this
issue. Thus, this paper will do an analysis based on the limited
information acquired.
2. The proposal on the new salary structure for teachers is being scrutinized.
A public hearing forum on this matter still needs to be held before submitting
the proposal for the approval of the Cabinet and the legislator.
As a result, there could be some modification to this proposal.
1. PRESENT SITUATION OF THE STATUS OF TEACHERS
Thailand has made substantial progress in expanding access to education
at all levels. However, much remains to be done regarding the quality
and efficiency of education. The quality of education can be reflected
in several major elements of the educational system, but the most important
element is the quality of teachers who are accounted for the learning achievement
of the students.
1.1
Qualifications of Teachers
The quality of teachers or teaching staff is, as mentioned, the most significant
element in improving the standard of education. Thus, the qualifications
of teaching staff and the quality of their teaching are currently issues
of concern for education development in Thailand.
The total number of teachers in Thailand in 1998 amounted to 684,638, approximately
85 percent of whom were in public schools, while the remaining 15 percent
were in private schools. A nationwide survey conducted in 1998 shows
that 84.7 percent of teachers who taught in primary schools held a Bachelor
degree or higher, while 95.9 percent of those in secondary schools held
the same level of degree. However, disparities in the qualifications
of teachers exist among teachers who teach in various parts of the country,
both at primary and secondary levels. Office of the National Primary
Education Commission (ONPEC) has roughly 50 percent more teachers with
less than 14 years of formal schooling teaching in the North and Northeast
than those teaching in the Central region. The Northeast also has
the lowest percentage of teachers with a Bachelor degree or higher.
Compared with the Central region, the Northeast has almost 50 percent more
teachers with only diploma level qualifications (Table 1).
As for secondary school teachers under the Department of General Education
(DGE), the Central region also has an advantage in terms of qualified teachers.
The South has the lowest percentage of teachers with Bachelor degree or
higher level of education. The Northeast has nearly double percentage
of teachers who have only diploma level of education than the Central region
(Table 1).
Table 1 Allocation
of Teachers under ONPEC and DGE by Educational Qualifications and Region
of Teaching, 1998
| Educational Qualifications |
Region
of Teaching
|
Less than 14 years
of education
|
Diploma,
equivalent to 14
years of schooling
|
Bachelor degree
or Higher
|
| ONPEC |
Central
South
North
Northeast |
3.96%
4.10%
6.03%
6.06%
|
8.01%
10.45%
8.51%
11.63%
|
88.03%
88.45%
85.46%
82.31%
|
| DGE |
Central
South
North
Northeast |
0.32%
0.06%
0.40%
0.26%
|
2.52%
5.35%
3.99%
4.34%
|
97.16%
94.05%
95.61%
95.40%
|
Source: Fry, Gerald. Teaching Personnel
Strategy in Thailand: A Review and Recommendations, Prepared for UNESCO-Bangkok,
1999
1.2Workload
of Teachers
According to the standard criteria, the total workload of primary, lower
secondary and upper secondary school teachers is 35 hours per week which
includes teaching load as well as other tasks. A survey on the workload
of teachers conducted by ONEC in the first semester of the academic year
1999 reveals that the average workload of teachers at all levels was 28.7
hours per week, which was below the standard. Additionally, the amount
of time teachers at all levels actually spent in teaching was less than
half of their total workload. The rest of their time was spent in
preparing lessons, teaching support and others as shown in Table 2.
Table 2 Workload
of Teachers by Level of Education They Teach and their Activities,
Academic Year 1999
|
Activities
|
Level of
Education
|
Teaching
|
Preparing
lessons
|
Teaching
Support
|
Others
|
Total
(hours per week)
|
| Primary |
13.3
|
5.5
|
5.0
|
3.5
|
27.3
|
Lower
Secondary |
13.9
|
5.5
|
5.5
|
4.0
|
28.9
|
Upper
Secondary |
12.5
|
7.0
|
5.8
|
4.8
|
30.1
|
Source: Education Survey and Research
Centre, ONEC
The amount of time teachers spent in each activity varies depending on
the subject areas they teach. Mathematics teachers seemed to have
the highest workload, on average of 31.4 hours per week, while Thai language
teachers had only 21.4 hours of workload per week as shown in Table 3.
However, it should be noted that a teacher may teach in more than one subject
area.
Table 3 Workload
of Teachers by Subject Areas They Teach and their Activities,
Academic Year 1999
|
Activities
|
Subject
Areas
|
Teaching
|
Preparing
Lessons
|
Teaching
Support
|
Others
|
Total
(hour per week)
|
| Mathematics |
17.2
|
5.8
|
4.9
|
3.5
|
31.4
|
| Science |
11.0
|
6.3
|
5.1
|
4.1
|
26.5
|
Social
Sciences |
10.9
|
5.8
|
4.9
|
3.4
|
25.0
|
Foreign
Languages |
10.0
|
5.8
|
4.9
|
3.4
|
24.1
|
Thai
Language |
6.9
|
5.9
|
4.9
|
3.7
|
21.4
|
Source: Education Survey and
Research Centre, ONEC
1.3
Student-Teacher Ratio
Student-teacher ratio is one major indicator of the internal efficiency
of an educational system. In Thailand, at the pre-primary level of
education, the student-teacher ratio lowered from 26:1 in 1997 to 20:1
in 1998 which was below the standard of 23:1 set by the Teachers Civil
Service Commission (TCSC). The student-teacher ratio at the primary
level of education was only 21:1 in 1997 and 18:1 in 1998 which was below
the standard of 25:1.
Table 4
Student-Teacher Ratio by Level of Education, 1997-1998
Level of
Education
|
Standard set by
TCSC
|
1997
|
1998
|
| Pre-primary |
23:1
|
26:1
|
20:1
|
| Primary |
25:1
|
21:1
|
18:1
|
Lower
Secondary |
17:1
|
21:1
|
20:1
|
Upper
Secondary |
18:1
|
18:1
|
18:1
|
Source: Education Information
Centre, ONEC
1.4
Teacher-Classroom Ratio
Teacher-classroom ratio is important in terms of educational quality.
If the teacher-classroom ratio is less than one, it means that there are
not enough teachers to cover every classroom, which can adversely affect
the quality of teaching and learning. The overall teacher-classroom
ratio in primary and secondary schools in Thailand from 1996-1998 was higher
than one, indicating adequate teaching staff, as shown in Table 5.
Table 5
Teacher-Classroom Ratio at Primary and Secondary Levels of Education,
1996-1998
|
Teacher-Classroom Ratio
|
|
Level of Education
|
1996
|
1997
|
1998
|
| Primary School |
1.11
|
1.61
|
16.7
|
| Secondary School |
2.13
|
2.91
|
2.03
|
Source: Education Information
Centre, ONEC
1.5
Career Path
In Thailand, the Teachers Civil Service Commission takes charge of the
issuance and amendment of laws, regulations, criteria and procedures for
the administration of civil service teachers under the Ministry of Education.
The teachers are promoted on the basis of merit, seniority and educational
qualifications. When the merit system is used as a basis for promotion,
teaching performance and professional service are taken into account.
The teachers can be promoted from teaching positions to administrative
and supervising positions (e.g. school principal). The relocation
of teachers across different levels of education i.e. from primary
to secondary school is quite rare. However, in exceptional cases,
the relocation across levels is possible.
1.6
Economic Status
1.6.1
Salary
Like all other professions within the public sector, the salary of teachers
is basically determined by their educational qualifications when first
entering the teaching profession. The salary of teachers is fairly
low when compared with that of employees in the private sector who have
similar qualifications. The teachers' salary scale is the same as
other civil servants. The annual increment depends upon teaching
performance, professional service and higher educational qualifications
acquired. The salary scale of teachers is revised occasionally but
the frequency of revision is not consistent. The salary of teachers
in public and private schools also differs. Although some private
schools provide higher salary for teachers, others pay less than public
schools. The average salary of Thai teachers in public schools is
roughly 150,000 baht per year or 12,500 baht per month. Approximately
37 percent of Thai teachers are on the salary of under average.
1.6.2
Other Monetary Incentives
Public school teachers are provided with some fringe benefits such as free
medical care and subsidized child education. Some benefits like medical
care cover not only the teachers themselves but also their family members
including their parents. Apart from the mentioned benefits, free
or subsidized housing and hardship allowance are provided for teachers
who are assigned to teach in remote and difficult areas. In addition,
housing loans and loans for motor-cycle or car purchase are also available.
Travel allowance is provided for teachers who teach in remote areas and
for those who travel on official trips.
The average retirement age for teachers is 60 year of age, for both male
and female teachers. After retirement, the teachers are entitled
to pension. The amount of pension fund is calculated based on the
years of service and the last month's salary. In order to be qualified
for retirement pension, the teachers must complete at least 25 years of
service.
1.6.3
Non-monetary Incentives
The teachers are entitled to take sick leave, annual leave as well as a
leave for religious purposes. The allowed length of time for each
leave varies. Buddhist male teachers are allowed to take 3 month
leave with full pay to be ordained as a monk, while Muslim teachers are
permitted to take leave to Mecca with full pay. Female teachers are
allowed to take maternity leave for up to 60 days with full pay and up
to 90 days without pay for the last 30 days. Additionally, the teachers
are also permitted to take study leave for up to 5 years with full pay.
1.6.4
Teachers' Debt Situation
A large number of teachers in Thailand have had financial difficulties
due to the minimal salary received which cannot match their living expenses.
A survey on debt situation of teachers under the Ministry of Education
conducted in September 1996 shows that 507,607 teachers (86.1% of total
teachers) were in debt for many types of loans. The total teachers'
debts in the formal system amounted to 81,162 million baht. The sources
of their loans were such as Teachers Savings Union, commercial banks, financial
institutions and other financial service institutions.
The two major causes of teachers' debts were, firstly, to buy cars or electrical
appliances (30.6%), and secondly, to pay for daily living expenses (24.4%).
Details on causes and amount of debts are shown in Table 7.
Table 7
Causes and Amount of Teachers' Debts
|
Causes of Debt
|
Number of Teachers
(as Debtors)
|
Percentage
|
Amount of Debt
(million baht)
|
1. To buy cars or
electrical appliances |
155,467
|
30.6
|
19,126
|
| 2. To pay for daily living expenses |
123,849
|
24.4
|
19,225
|
| 3. To acquire their own houses |
63,165
|
12.4
|
16,975
|
4. To pay for their
children's school fees |
47,244
|
9.3
|
5,803
|
| 5. To pay for other debts |
44,764
|
8.8
|
6,802
|
6. To invest in other
Businesses |
36,644
|
7.2
|
8,168
|
7. To pay for further study or
self-development courses |
26,931
|
5.4
|
2,625
|
| 8.Others |
9,543
|
1.9
|
2,438
|
|
Total
|
507,607
|
100.0
|
81,162
|
To help alleviating the teachers' debt problem, the Teachers Civil Service
Commission has set up a revolving fund with a purpose to promote debt relief
for teachers under the Ministry of Education. The fund provides loans
with low interest rates which can help the teachers to pay for their previous
debts with higher interest rates. This fund is expected to help boost
the morale of teachers so that they can perform more efficiently, resulting
in more effective teaching and learning.
In 1999, the number of teachers who were in debt was decreased. There
were 378,058 teachers (78% of total teachers) in the formal debt system.
However, the total amount of debts was increased to 95,361 million baht.
Although surveys on teachers' debt in the informal sector were very limited
due mainly to limited information revealed by the teachers themselves,
it was estimated that in 1999, teachers' debts in the informal sector was
totaled to 6,280 million baht.
2. GUIDELINES TO IMPROVE THE ECONOMIC STATUS
OF TEACHERS
In order to improve the economic status of teachers, several measures have
been proposed, mainly, to increase teachers' salary, remuneration, welfare,
and other benefits, including to set up teacher promotion and development
funds. As for Thailand, it is considered an urgency to implement
all the mentioned measures to raise the morale of teachers and to motivate
them to perform efficiently. However, in order to be entitled to
all the increased remuneration and benefits, the teachers should be required
to continuously improve both themselves and their teaching quality.
In addition, they should be evaluated according to the professional standards
which are to be set and they should also hold an appropriate license to
teach.
In this connection, Chapter 7 of the National Education Act B.E. 2542 (1999)lays
out guidelines for a fully integrated Teaching Profession Reform to upgrade
the standard of teaching profession. The followings are the identified
guidelines:
2.1 A professional body is to be established with the objective of supervising
the quality of personnel in the teaching profession to maintain the professional
standards and ethics.
2.2 Teachers must hold a professional license.
2.3 Teachers have to improve themselves constantly to maintain the standard
of a highly respected profession.
2.4 Teachers must be evaluated by both their parent institutions and external
agencies.
2.5 A new salary scheme including additional remuneration, welfare and
other benefits is to be worked out.
2.6 Two funds will be established, which are the Fund for the Development
of Teachers, Faculty Staff and Education Personnel and the Fund for the
Promotion and Development of Teachers, Faculty Staff and Education Personnel.
The purpose of the later fund is to provide grants for innovations, outstanding
achievements and honorary awards for teachers, faculty staff and education
personnel.
3. GUIDELINES TO SET TEACHERS' EMOLUMENT PACKAGE
3.1 Principles for Setting Teachers' Emolument Package
3.1.1
Merit
Teachers' emolument package should be determined based on the nature of
their work and their performance.
3.1.2
Sufficiency
Teachers' emolument package should be commensurate with the actual costs
of living and enable them to maintain the status of highly respected profession.
In other words, the emolument should be sufficient for them to live a decent
life without having to do extra work to meet the living expenses.
As a result, they will be able to perform their teaching duty efficiently.
3.1.3
Equity
Emolument package for teachers should be determined taking into consideration
the equity with other highly respected professions. Within the teaching
profession itself, all teachers should be treated equally. Emolument
should be determined based on the level of difficulty of their work, level
of responsibility, experience, work performance, training and other criteria
required to obtain a professional license.
3.2
Framework for Setting Teachers' and Education Personnel's Salary Scale
3.2.1 Teachers' salary should be sufficient for them to maintain their
social and professional status and make them feel confident in and proud
of this profession.
3.2.2 The starting salary for licensed teachers should be comparatively
high enough for them to build a good career, but the annual increment can
be proportionately lowered later in the career path.
3.2.3 Teachers' salary should be adjusted in line with their acquired education.
3.2.4 Annual increment should be in compliance with the individual's work
performance and the quality of teaching, but can be dependent upon the
overall economic situation of the country.
3.2.5 Teachers' salary scale should be favorable for their progress in
the career path i.e. their salary should be able to be raised annually.
Professional development should be taken into account when evaluated for
annual increment.
3.2.6 Teachers' salary scale should be correlated with their academic ranking
and be described as salary bars.
3.2.7 Classification of teachers and education personnel should be done
in accordance with the level of difficulty of each specialized area.
3.3
Professional Standards
To become a teacher, one must go through a five-year degree study program.
This longer-than standard program aims to provide extensive training in
the subject area chosen and to inculcate teaching spirit into the teacher-to-be.
In addition, the graduates from this five-year program will be required
to undertake a one-year internship in an educational institution certified
by the professional body in order to be eligible to apply for a professional
license. A license as well as other qualifications as required by
the professional body are needed to be able to teach in educational institutions.
These professional standards are set to assure the quality of teachers
and standard of education.
3.4
Teachers' Salary Scale and Remuneration
Teachers' salary and remuneration package should be determined in harmony
with the prospective progress in their career path. That is, teachers'
rank and salary should be promoted in commensurate with their educational
background, ability, seniority, and specialization. In addition,
their salary should also be sufficient for them to maintain their social
status and comparable to that of other highly respected professions e.g.
medical and engineering professions.
3.4.1 Teacher Academic Ranking
To be in line with the nature of teachers' work which requires ability,
experience and specialization, an Academic Rank Classification (ARC) is
to be established. According to the ARC system, teachers' academic
ranking is classified into four categories:
(1)
Teacher
A teacher performs accordingly to the rules and orders given to achieve
the objective of executing the teaching work effectively. A teacher
teaches in a subject area assigned as part of the curriculum.
(2)
Senior Teacher
A senior teacher performs independently and can make his/her own decision
with advice from supervisors. He/she is able to do research and develop
his/her teaching to become more effective and can be exemplified for others.
(3)
Specialist Teacher
A specialist teacher performs systematically and is able to initiate new
activities that serve the needs of learners and communities. Such
newly initiated activities can be widely practiced in a beneficial manner
elsewhere. A specialist teacher can also provide advice to other
teachers.
(4)
Senior Specialist Teacher
A senior specialist teacher is not only able to perform systematically
but also able to develop the working system using new innovations in research
and development of teaching and learning which can be applied in other
arenas in the education system. A senior specialist teacher can give
advice to other teachers and can also evaluate other teachers' work.
His/her work can significantly contribute to the development of teaching
profession as well as to the development of the educational institutions,
the communities and society as a whole.
3.4.2
Teacher Salary Scale
The teacher salary scale will be determined in line with their academic
ranking. Thus, the salary scale is divided into 4 salary bars, based
on the salary scale of civil servants. In each salary bar, minimum
to maximum salary steps are included as well as an efficiency bar.
Details are as appeared in the following table and figure.
|
Rank
|
Salary
Minimum-Maximum
|
Efficiency Bar
|
| Teacher |
8,190 - 21,320
|
18,500
|
| Senior Teacher |
11,120 - 29,810
|
26,990
|
| Specialist Teacher |
16,800 - 44,930
|
40,790
|
| Senior Specialist Teacher |
25,370 - 59,090
|
53,390
|
Figure 1 Teachers' Salary Bars
Bar 1is
the salary bar for teachers with the rank of Teacher. There are 22
steps in this salary bar, with the starting salary of 8,190 baht and maximum
salary of 21,320 baht.
Bar 2 is
the salary bar for teachers with the rank of Senior Teacher. There
are 23 steps in this salary bar, with the starting salary of 11,120 baht
and maximum salary of 29,810 baht.
Bar 3is
the salary bar for teachers with the rank of Specialist Teacher.
There are 23 steps in this salary bar, with the starting salary of 16,800
baht and maximum salary of 44,900 baht.
Bar 4 is
the salary bar for teachers with the rank of Senior Specialist Teacher.
There are 19 steps in this salary bar, with the starting salary of 25,370
baht and maximum salary of 59,090 baht.
3.4.3
Teacher Starting Salary
As the new bachelor's degree program in education (five-year program) requires
an additional one-year internship in an educational institution certified
by the professional body, the starting salary for teachers who first enter
the teaching profession will have to be adjusted to be commensurate with
the longer duration required by the study programs in education, both at
bachelor and master's as well as doctoral degrees.
3.4.4
Efficiency Bar
Efficiency bar is the range of salary steps during which teachers are to
be evaluated for promotion to a higher academic rank. The efficiency
bar is designated at the last three steps of a salary bar. A teacher
who can pass the evaluation during the efficiency bar will continue to
progress on the salary steps in the same salary bar until he/she reaches
the maximum step before being promoted to a higher salary bar, while a
teacher who cannot pass the evaluation once he/she reaches the efficiency
bar will be on the same salary step until he/she can pass the evaluation.
3.4.5
Teacher Remuneration
Teacher remuneration comprises three main types of supplementary allowances
and benefits, which are academic rank allowance, honorary award allowance
and other benefits.
(1)
Academic Rank Allowance
Academic rank allowance is granted to qualified teachers in correspond
with the quantity and quality of work performed by them. Teachers
who are qualified for academic rank allowance are teachers who have passed
the evaluation at the Teacher rank, at the minimum, and are promoted to
the ranks of senior teachers, specialist teachers and senior specialist
teachers respectively. The academic rank allowance is an addition
to basic salary and will not be taken into account when calculating pension.
The rates of academic rank allowance are shown in the following table.
|
Rank
|
Rate (baht per month)
|
| Senior Teacher |
3,500
|
| Specialist Teacher |
5,600
|
| Senior Specialist Teacher |
9,900
|
(2)
Honorary Award Allowance
Honorary award allowance is granted to teachers who have been awarded with
significant honorary awards which are to be specified, regardless of the
academic rank that they currently hold. Honorary award allowance
is a one-time payment at a fixed rate and will not be taken into account
when calculating pension.
(3)
Other Benefits
Teachers who take study leave according to the needs of their educational
institutions are considered working full-time and will be entitled to a
special one-step increment annually during the study program period.
After the completion of study, these teachers can use the acquired degrees
to adjust their salary step if the current salary is not commensurate with
the acquired degree.
Conclusion
The above-discussed guidelines and principles for Teaching Profession Reform
Process are a fully integrated approach aiming at upgrading the teaching
profession to become a highly respected profession. The reform process
should start from the production of teaching personnel by implementing
the five-year teacher education program which also requires an additional
one-year internship. Teacher development programs should also be
continuously implemented to increase the efficiency of in-service teachers.
Furthermore, teachers' quality and professional standards should be assured
by a professional body which should also be authorized to issue professional
licenses for teachers. Additionally, teacher promotion and development
funds should be established to assist teachers financially. Similarly,
teachers' emolument package should be adjusted in order to provide the
teachers with sufficient income to maintain the social and economic status
of a highly respected profession. It is highly hoped that if all
these reform guidelines are implemented successfully, the quality of teachers
will be improved as their morale will be raised. Eventually, they
will be motivated to work more efficiently and will have determination
to develop the teaching and learning system under their part of responsibility,
thereby Thailand's overall educational system will be developed.
Annex 1: Action Plan to Improve
the Economic Status of Teachers
1. Issue a law on a new scheme of salary,
remuneration and other benefits for teachers (in line with Section 55 of
the National Education Act B.E. 2542)
Current Situation
Teachers' income is not commensurate with
their living expenses, resulting in teachers' debt problem. They
are eventually demotivated, and even forced to earn extra income by way
of extra tutoring or having a supplementary occupation.
Objective
To issue a law on a new scheme of salary,
remuneration and other benefits for teachers to allow them to earn sufficient
income commensurate with their social and professional status.
Steps to be taken
(1) Conduct a study to lay out guidelines for a new scheme of salary, remuneration
and other benefits for teachers. May-October 2000
(2) Organize a pubic hearing forum to obtain opinions from all involved
as well as the public. November-December 2000
(3) Modify the guidelines. January 2001
(4) Submit the new scheme to the Cabinet February 2001
(5) Process the issuance of the law (submit to the Office of the Council
of the State, the House of Representatives, and the House of Senate) March
2001-August 2002
(6) Coordinate with concerned agencies for necessary preparation
e.g. the Budget Bureau, institutions employing teachers. March 2001-August
2001
(7) Enforce the new teacher salary scheme nation-wide 20 August
2002
2. Improve the efficiency of in-service
teachers to enable them to obtain appropriate professional licenses and
to prepare them to be transferred to a new salary scheme
Current Situation
(1) Approximately 18 percent of all in-service teachers hold a degree lower
than a bachelor degree which will soon be the minimum degree required for
acquiring a teaching profession license.
(2) Some teachers still have not applied the new teaching approach introduced
by the Teaching Reform Process of the National Education Act B.E. 2542
(1999). Their current approach still focuses on teachers instead
of students as the center of learning.
(3) Some teachers do not improve themselves and their teaching performance.
Objective
All teachers hold a bachelor degree in education and improve themselves
continuously to be able to obtain a professional license which, according
to the National Education Act B.E. 2542 (1999), is a requirement for teachers
to be transferred to the new salary scheme.
Steps to be taken
(1) Work out a policy and plan in the production of teachers, development
of in-service teachers, development of institutions responsible for production
of teachers and improvement of faculty staff in the Faculty of Education
of colleges and universities. September-November 2000
(2) Submit the plan to the Cabinet December 2000
(3) Coordinate with institutions responsible for production of teachers
and institutions employing teachers to work out plans for the production
and development of teachers to serve the appropriate needs in teaching
personnel, both in terms of quantity and quality.
December 2000-February 2001
(4) Support institutions responsible for production of teachers to conduct
a research and experimentation project (in accordance with the ability
of each institution) on the production and development of teachers, development
of institutions responsible for production of teachers and faculty staff
development.
February-July 2001
(5) Introduce successful research and experimentation results to more institutions
responsible for production of teachers for further implementation. Form
August 2001 onward
(6) Monitor the implementation process and evaluate the result periodically
From February 2001
3. Set up a fund for the development
of teachers, faculty staff and education personnel and a fund for the promotion
and development of teachers, faculty staff and education personnel (in
line with Section 52 and Section 55 of the National Education Act B.E.
2542)
Current Situation
(1) In the past, most of the budget for teacher development was allocated
to institutions employing teachers. As a result, teacher development
was done unsystematically and discontinuously depending upon the budget
allocated each year and the policy of each institution.
(2) Very little has been done with regard to providing incentives to encourage
teachers' innovations, outstanding achievements or to providing honorary
awards to highly respected teachers. The major constraint was budgetary
reason.
Objectives
(1) To establish sufficient funds for the development of teachers, faculty
staff and educational personnel to allow teachers to select a competent
institution to develop their expertise in the field directly relating to
their current responsibility. Teachers will then be able to apply
the acquired knowledge to develop their teaching quality effectively.
(2) To establish a fund for the promotion and development for teachers,
Faculty staff and educational personnel to provide incentives in the form
of rewards for outstanding innovations and honorary awards for highly respected
teachers.
Steps to be taken
(1) Conduct a study on the establishment of the two funds September-November
2000
(2) Hold a public hearing forum December 2000
(3) Modify the study result January 2001
(4) Submit it to the Cabinet February 2001
(5) Process the Issuance of the law March 2001 onward
(6) Prepare to set up the funds (coordinate with the Budget Bureau and
other concerned agencies) March 2001-August 2002
(7) Set up the funds August 2002
Conditions for success
The success in implementing the above planned actions depends on the following
factors:
(1) strong and genuine support from the government especially in providing
financial support,
(2) full cooperation from concerned agencies, and
(3) international support and cooperation, both in the form of financial
support, exchange of expertise and experience, and successful innovations
from the teaching reform process that Thailand is undertaking in compliance
with the National Education Act B.E. 2542 (1999).
The above-discussed actions are planned not only
to improve the economic status of teachers but also to complement to the
overall teacher development efforts at the national level, leading to a
fully integrated reform process. The whole process aims at upgrading
the standard of teaching profession which will contribute to the development
in educational quality eventually.
APPENDIX
National Education Act
of B.E. 2542 (1999)
Chapter 7
Teachers, Faculty Staff and Educational Personnel
References
1. Office of Education Reform, Draft Policy Paper on Salary and Compensation
For Teachers and Education Personnel.
2. Office of the National Education Commission, Office of the Prime Minister,
National Education Act BE 2542 (1999).
3. Office of the National Education Commission, Office of the
Prime Minister, Education in Thailand 1999.
4. Office of the National Education Commission, Office of the
Prime Minister, Draft Report on Education in Thailand 2000/2001.
5. Office of the National Education Commission, Office of the
Prime Minister, Draft Report on Academic Coupons.
6. Office of the Teachers Civil Service Commission, Ministry of Education,
The Solution of Teachers' Financial Problems, working paper.
7. Office of the Teachers Civil Service Commission, Personnel Management
Technology Division, Statistics on Teacher and Education Personnel, working
paper.
8. UNESCO, Principle Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Partnerships
in Teacher Development for a New Asia ; Report of an International
Conference organized by UNESCO-ACEID and UNICEF in association with the
Office of the National Education Commission, Thailand, held in Bangkok,
6-8 December 1995.
9. Uthai Dulykasem, The Status of Teachers in Some Pacific and Southeast
Asian Countries, the paper presented at the International Conference, Partnership
in Teacher Development For A New Asia, Bangkok, Thailand, 6-8 December
1995
From
THE 2000 APEID INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON
INNOVATION AND REFORM IN TEACHER EDUCATION
FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
24 October - 1 November 2000
Hosted by
Hiroshima University
Higashi-Hiroshima City
Japan
|